Performance knits, technical fabrics, and premium small runs from a vetted Busan factory partner. KORUS FTA duty-free entry to the US.
South Korea is not the cheapest place to make apparel. It is the right choice when the product, the program, or the brand profile makes that trade-off worth it.
In our experience running production for founder-led brands, Korea wins for five things:
It also wins on tariffs. Korean-origin apparel enters the US duty-free under the KORUS Free Trade Agreement, which is a meaningful landed-cost advantage in the current tariff environment. We get to that below.
Korea is the wrong choice for:
If you fall into one of these buckets, we'll tell you on the first call. We won't take a program to Korea that should be running somewhere else.
Our primary Korea production runs through a single vetted partner factory in Busan, on the southern coast. The factory has been operating since the 1990s and serves global brands across performance, premium knit, and technical outerwear categories. We keep the partnership tight on purpose — one well-run relationship beats a directory of unvetted leads.
The capability stack covers the full production cycle:
Garment categories produced regularly: polo shirts, pullovers, sweaters, T-shirts, woven shirts, quilted jackets, technical outerwear, socks, and face masks. We can quote on adjacent categories — talk to us.
The Korea–U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) eliminates US import duties on apparel that originates in South Korea. For most knit and woven categories, this means a 0% tariff at port. For brands that have spent the last few years watching China-origin tariffs stack — Section 301, IEEPA, reciprocal — the math has shifted.
KORUS uses a yarn-forward rule of origin for most apparel. In plain English: yarn must be spun in Korea or the US, and the fabric must be knit or woven in Korea or the US, for the finished garment to qualify as Korean-origin. There are exceptions and short-supply provisions for fibers and yarns not commercially available in either country.
We handle the documentation. The factory provides a Certificate of Origin with the shipment, your customs broker files it at entry, and the duty comes off.
On a knit polo at a $14 FOB Korea, US duty under MFN treatment would be 16.5% — about $2.31 per unit. Under KORUS, it's $0. On a 5,000-unit PO, that's roughly $11,500 in duty savings on a single style.
Compare that to the same polo manufactured in China in 2026, where the same garment faces a stacked Section 301 + IEEPA tariff that often exceeds 50% on apparel HTS lines. The unit-cost gap between Korea and China at the factory gate — typically 20% to 40% — narrows or reverses entirely once tariffs are factored in.
This calculation has changed how we advise clients. Two years ago, Korea was a quality play. Today, for the right product, it's also the cheaper landed cost.
A US activewear brand at $3M annual revenue came to us in 2025 running production in China. They were taking 4–6 week sampling cycles, defect rates above 3% on technical fabric programs, and watching their landed cost climb every quarter as China tariffs stacked.
We moved one product line, their flagship performance pullover, ~12,000 units annually across four colorways, to Korea. The tech pack required a moisture-wicking finish on a recycled polyester knit, plus a small antimicrobial treatment on the underarm panel. China was running it, but quality was inconsistent.
Outcome on the Korea program after one full production cycle: factory cost up 28%, landed cost down 9% after KORUS duty-free entry, defect rate under 1%, sample cycle compressed from 5 weeks to 3. The brand moved a second product line over the following quarter.
This is the math that's working in 2026. It doesn't work for every brand or every product. It works when the product belongs in Korea and the brand is willing to pay a quality and origin premium that the tariff regime mostly absorbs.